Hello, my friend,
I have been thinking about simplicity.
Not minimalism, exactly.
Not emptiness.
Simplicity as clarity.
The simpler my life becomes, the more clearly I seem to understand what matters. The clearer my vision becomes for my work, the more rewarding the work itself feels. I am increasingly interested in removing what does not belong, not because I want less meaning, but because I want fewer things competing with it.
I feel this happening in my paintings, too.
My work continues moving toward abstraction, atmosphere, and emotion. I find myself wanting to explain less. Fewer unnecessary forms. Fewer decisions made simply because I can make them. More space. More restraint. More room for a painting to be felt before it is understood.
Perhaps that is what interests me most about simplicity.
It is not necessarily the absence of complexity.
Sometimes it is what we arrive at after complexity has been considered carefully.
After the editing.
After the noise.
After we have learned enough to recognize what deserves to remain.
Anselm Kiefer Pavilion exhibition room with Anselm Kiefer, Black Flakes, 2007, Oil, emulsion, shellac, soil, and twigs on canvas
A Building for One Painting
This week, David Chipperfield Architects opened a new pavilion at Museum Würth 2 in Künzelsau, Germany.
Its purpose is extraordinarily simple.
It exists for one painting.
Anselm Kiefer's monumental Schwarze Flocken, created in 2007, measures approximately eleven meters high and seven meters wide. Because of its extraordinary scale, the work had never been publicly exhibited. The new pavilion was designed specifically to make that encounter possible.
There is something deeply appealing to me about a building with such clarity of purpose.
The architecture does not attempt to compete with Kiefer's painting. Instead, Chipperfield and Kiefer worked together on the proportions, openings, wall surfaces, and atmosphere of the room itself. The building uses restrained materials, exposed timber roof beams, clay plaster, and carefully placed rooflights that allow the daylight to shift naturally throughout the day and across the seasons.
The architects describe the intention as creating a tranquil atmosphere that slows the act of seeing and directs attention toward the artwork.
That may be the most compelling thing about it.
The building knows what it is for.
It does not need to perform ten functions at once.
It does not need to command attention for itself.
It creates the conditions in which something else can be experienced more fully.
There is a lesson in that well beyond architecture.
Sometimes clarity is not created by adding another idea.
Sometimes it comes from deciding what deserves the room.
Ce Roser, Running with the Sun, Works 1961–2014, paintings and works on paper by the New York-based artist who was born in 1925.
Learning to Say More With Less
I discovered an artist this week whose work I did not know before.
Her name is Ce Roser.
At 101, Roser is the subject of Running with the Sun, Works 1961–2014, currently on view at VeneKlasen in London. The exhibition traces more than five decades of her abstract painting and works on paper, and it is her first solo exhibition in Europe.
I am glad I found her.
What interests me particularly is the evolution visible across those decades.
Her earlier work can be dense, gestural, and richly active. As the years pass, the compositions often become more restrained. More white appears. Forms become fewer. Gestures become more selective.
Yet the work does not become emotionally smaller.
If anything, it seems distilled.
That distinction matters.
An artist can spend years learning technique, building vocabulary, developing instincts, and discovering possibilities. Eventually, maturity may not mean demonstrating everything one knows.
It may mean knowing what can be left out.
That idea feels especially relevant to me right now as my own paintings continue moving further toward abstraction.
I am becoming less interested in describing a thing completely.
I am more interested in finding the point at which color, light, movement, and atmosphere are enough.
Not because there is less to say.
Because perhaps the work has learned how to say it differently.
What I'm Reading
I am currently reading W. Lee Warren's The Life-Changing Art of Self-Brain Surgery.
Warren is a practicing neurosurgeon who writes about neuroscience alongside Christian faith, and the book explores how habitual patterns of thought can shape our emotional lives and how deliberately changing those patterns may influence the way we experience the world.
I am still reading, so I am not offering a review.
But one aspect of the book has stayed with me.
Not every thought deserves the same amount of attention.
That sounds simple.
It is not.
We can spend enormous amounts of time rehearsing the same worries, assumptions, irritations, or old narratives simply because they have become familiar.
The idea that we can become more intentional about what we continue feeding with our attention connects surprisingly well with what I have been thinking about elsewhere.
Editing does not happen only on a canvas.
Sometimes we have to edit what occupies our mental space.
What is useful?
What is true?
What deserves more attention?
What has simply become noise?
That, too, may be a form of simplicity.
Something I Have Been Writing
Interestingly, this same idea has been appearing in a project I have been working on quietly for some time.
House of Stefani plans to release my first book, The Professional Artist Handbook, on November 15.
The book grew from years of working with artists, collectors, galleries, designers, and curators, and from seeing how often talented artists are expected to understand the professional art world without anyone ever clearly explaining how it works.
I wanted to change that.
The book is not about formulas for becoming successful. It is about building a thoughtful, sustainable professional life through clarity, preparation, relationships, trust, and stewardship.
As I have been finishing the manuscript, I noticed how often one idea appears in different forms:
Clarity is almost always more powerful than complexity.
And elsewhere, while writing about portfolio development:
What we choose to leave out can be as important as what we include.
I wrote those passages for artists.
I am beginning to think they apply to considerably more than art.
More about the handbook soon.
What Remains
The older I become, the less interested I am in complexity for its own sake.
I am not interested in a fuller calendar simply because it is full.
I do not want more ideas simply because more are available.
And increasingly, I do not want more marks in a painting unless they belong there.
There is freedom in asking a simpler question:
What matters?
A building can exist for one painting.
An artist can spend a lifetime discovering which gestures are necessary.
A thought can be examined before we decide whether it deserves another hour of our attention.
A career can become clearer when its purpose is understood.
And a life can become richer when we stop filling every available space.
Perhaps simplicity is not about reducing a life.
Perhaps it is about making more room for the life we actually mean to live.
Removing the unnecessary does not make what remains smaller.
Sometimes it finally gives what remains enough room to become larger.
And perhaps that is the point.
Not less for the sake of less.
Only enough space to see clearly what remains.
If something here brought someone to mind, please feel free to share this letter with them.
If you’re new here, welcome.
Have a fabulous weekend.
Christina
Christina Stefani
Founder, House of Stefani
If you received this by forwarding, you can explore past issues of This Week in Art, Design & Culture. Or subscribe below.